CAE
All Research

Source Library

Professional working source library with tiered classification (Tier A for government/regulator/IR sources, Tier B for company/secondary sources, Tier Academic for peer-reviewed research). Contains 27 peer-reviewed articles across XR/VR training, AI/ML assessment, neurophysiology, maritime simulation, eVTOL/UAM, and human factors. Covers CAE baseline, cross-market demand, China hidden-risk signals, competitor records, and Gulf/India/Singapore evidence.

10 sources

Library Structure

Tier A definitionOfficial regulator, government, institutional, investor-relations, or primary source
Tier B definitionOfficial company source or high-value secondary source
Tier AcademicPeer-reviewed journal article, conference paper, or systematic review with DOI
Language trackingEnglish and translated non-English material (Chinese, Korean, Arabic)
Coverage scopeCAE baseline, cross-market demand, China ecosystem, U.S. defense, Gulf/India/Singapore, peer-reviewed research

Academic Source Portfolio

27

Peer-Reviewed Articles

10

Full PDF Available

17

DOI-Only Reference

6

Research Domains Covered

Source Coverage by Category

CategoryTier A CountTier B CountAcademicLanguages
CAE baseline and disclosure10+20+2English
Cross-market demand signals25+15+3English, Chinese
China hidden-risk signals15+10+0Chinese, English
U.S. competitor records5+15+1English
Gulf / India / Singapore5+10+0English, Arabic
South Korea competitor records3+5+1English, Korean
XR/VR/AR training technology25+12English
AI/ML in simulation training347English
Maritime simulation234English
eVTOL / Urban Air Mobility124English

Peer-Reviewed Articles: XR/VR/AR Training (12 articles)

#Title / TopicDOI
1XR pilot simulator training — meta-analysis (Somerville et al. 2025, effect size 0.884, N=1237→67→5)10.1186/s42492-025-00206-w
2XR flight simulators — scoping review (Ross & Gilbey 2023, 760K new pilots needed, PTN first-solo shift)10.1007/s13272-023-00688-5
3AR formation flight training (Arjoni et al. 2023, SIVOR Level-D FFS, Brazil AF)10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14181
4VR flight simulation EEG patterns (Van Weelden et al. 2024, beta-ratios p<0.001, r=0.48-0.58)10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101282
5Spatial disorientation VR validation (Kim et al. 2025, 22 Korean F-15K pilots, SD=33% of accidents)10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104457
6VR HMD simulator, air force pilots10.1080/00140139.2025.2595656
7FSTD + AR acceptance, general aviation10.1038/s41598-025-85448-7
8XR in aerospace engineering (review)See ScienceDirect: S0376042125000442
9Mixed reality flight simulator evaluation10.2514/1.I011738
10Simulator fidelity, ab initio pilots10.1080/00140139.2024.2449110
11Flight sim perceptual-motor skills10.1038/s41598-025-12929-0
12FSTD ecological/cost advantage10.3390/app14188401

Peer-Reviewed Articles: AI/ML in Training (7 articles)

#Title / TopicDOI
13ML-based performance assessment in simulation training10.1007/s40593-025-00464-y
14AI in Finnish military simulators — scenario generationSee ScienceDirect: S1877050925031461
15Biofeedback + AI in XR training environments10.1177/10468781241236688
16Automation level impact on airline pilot performance (Causse et al. 2025, A320 Level-D, N=20)10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104456
17Affect and performance in simulated flying tasks — PRISMA review (Ruiz-Segura & Lajoie 2025, 29 articles)10.1080/24721840.2024.2425856
18Competency-based pilot assessment10.1007/s10111-023-00737-3
19EEG microstate analysis, pilot cognitive control10.1038/s41598-024-76046-0

Peer-Reviewed Articles: Maritime Simulation (4 articles)

#Title / TopicDOI
20Maritime education VR simulator — TAM study (Bacnar et al. 2025, N=84)10.3390/asi8030084
21Maritime team training for safety and security (Baldauf et al. 2016, WMU combined training)10.1080/19439962.2014.996932
22Maritime simulator curricula — competence management10.1007/s13437-024-00351-8
23Multimodal learning analytics in maritime training10.1007/s11412-024-09435-2

Peer-Reviewed Articles: eVTOL / Urban Air Mobility (4 articles)

#Title / TopicDOI
24Urban air mobility collaborative system-of-systems simulation (Naeem et al. 2025, DLR)10.1007/s13272-024-00796-w
25Mixed reality eVTOL training (CHI 2024)10.1145/3613904.3642060
26eVTOL training systemic approach (AIAA 2024)10.2514/6.2024-4214
27Digital twins for Advanced Air Mobility10.3390/drones9060394

Source Quality Notes

The strongest Tier A sources are official U.S. Army PEO STRI materials, CAE SEC filings, government procurement announcements, and regulator documents. Chinese-language government and SASAC sources provide unique evidence not available in English-language coverage. Source depth is strongest for the U.S. synthetic training stack and weakest for maritime and land flank competitors.

The academic portfolio (27 peer-reviewed articles) provides the evidence base for technology domain entries. Key findings include: XR training produces a large effect size (d=0.884) for pilot training transfer; VR generates measurably higher neurological engagement than desktop simulation (EEG beta-ratio effect sizes r=0.48-0.58); ML classifiers can predict student pilot pass/fail outcomes from early-phase performance data; spatial disorientation accounts for 33% of military aviation accidents and VR-based SD training shows promising transfer; maritime VR adoption is driven by perceived usefulness rather than ease of use; and eVTOL/UAM training requires entirely new competency frameworks beyond existing rotorcraft curricula. Ten articles have full PDF available for deep citation; 17 are indexed by DOI for reference.